Show simple item record

contributor authorTatsuaki Nakato
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:40:51Z
date available2017-05-08T20:40:51Z
date copyrightMarch 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281990%29116%3A3%28362%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23311
description abstractEleven existing, sediment‐transport formulas were tested against the field data measured at two United States Geological Survey (USGS) gauging stations along the Sacramento River in California, whose bed‐material sizes are classified as those ranging from fine sand to coarse gravel. They include the Ackers‐White Einstein‐Brown, Engelund‐Fredsoe, Engelund‐Hansen, Inglis‐Lacey, Karim, Meyer‐Peter and Mueller, Rijin, Schoklitsch, Toffaleti, and Yang formulas. General flow and sediment input variables required by each transport function, as well as dependent variables, are summarized and detailed, and measured hydraulic and sediment quantities including bed‐material size distributions are presented. The computed sediment discharges are tabulated for comparison, and are directly compared against the measured suspended‐sediment discharges. The computed values, however, are found to deviate significantly from the measured values except for a very few cases. The test results clearly demonstrate how difficult a task it is to predict sediment discharges in natural rivers.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleTests of Selected Sediment‐Transport Formulas
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:3(362)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record