Show simple item record

contributor authorA. J. Clemmens
contributor authorJ. A. Replogle
contributor authorY. Reinink
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:40:41Z
date available2017-05-08T20:40:41Z
date copyrightJanuary 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281990%29116%3A1%28102%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23223
description abstractLaboratory studies are conducted on a rectangular broad‐crested weir to determine the effects of entrance and exit conditions on the discharge and required energy loss. In doing so, a method for visually determining whether downstream conditions affect the flume calibration is developed. The current mathematical model of these flumes satisfactorily predicts both discharge and required head losses. Approach‐ramp slopes of 3:1 and 2:1 are shown to be acceptable for accurate discharge prediction, although a slight rounding of the approach ramp corners will improve predictions. At high ratios of energy head to throat length and with a sudden downstream transition, the model slightly underpredicts the required energy loss. As long as the water‐surface profile is dropping continuously from the approach ramp to the end of the throat, the downstream water level is not influencing discharge prediction. Field observations and measurements support these laboratory results, which should apply to most long‐throated flumes, since a rectangular broad‐crested weir represents the worst‐case conditions for head losses.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleField Predictability of Flume and Weir Operating Conditions
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:1(102)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record