| contributor author | Anania Mbabazi | |
| contributor author | Tarek Hegazy | |
| contributor author | Frank Saccomanno | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:40:30Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:40:30Z | |
| date copyright | October 2005 | |
| date issued | 2005 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9364%282005%29131%3A10%281142%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23131 | |
| description abstract | “But-for” is a widely used method for analyzing and apportioning project delays among the responsible parties. Despite its acceptability, the traditional but-for method suffers from serious drawbacks; namely its narrow focus on the point of view of a single party and its inability to accurately consider concurrent delays. In this technical note, several improvements have been made to the but-for method to produce repeatable results and to account for concurrent delays. Details of the modified but-for (MBF) method are provided along with an example to demonstrate its advantages. To automate the MBF method, it has been coded in a | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Modified But-For Method for Delay Analysis | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 131 | |
| journal issue | 10 | |
| journal title | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1142) | |
| tree | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 010 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
