Show simple item record

contributor authorMarc Weinstein
contributor authorJohn Gambatese
contributor authorSteven Hecker
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:40:27Z
date available2017-05-08T20:40:27Z
date copyrightOctober 2005
date issued2005
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282005%29131%3A10%281125%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23109
description abstractThis paper analyzes the impact of a large-scale safety-in-design initiative during the design and construction of a semiconductor manufacturing facility in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Drawing on multiple data sources including individual interviews, group interviews, construction documentation, and an expert panel involved in the initiative, the writers identify 26 potential design changes on the project and assess the importance of timing, trade contractor involvement, and the type of design change in determining whether a proposed design change was ultimately integrated into the final construction plans. The writers further consider whether adopted design changes would have occurred in the absence of the safety-in-design initiative and whether the accepted design changes ultimately impacted construction site safety on the project. This analysis of a full-scale safety-in-design initiative provides important insights into how injury prevention efforts in the construction industry can begin upstream by involving designers, engineers, and trade contractors in preconstruction processes.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCan Design Improve Construction Safety?: Assessing the Impact of a Collaborative Safety-in-Design Process
typeJournal Paper
journal volume131
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1125)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record