Show simple item record

contributor authorHugo A. Loaiciga
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:40:21Z
date available2017-05-08T20:40:21Z
date copyrightJanuary 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281989%29115%3A1%2882%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/23058
description abstractEmpirical quantiles constitute a simple alternative for estimating flow values for which there is a specified nonexceedance probability. The standard error of empirical quantile estimators is a measure of the variability to be expected about the numerical estimates obtained from flow records. It is shown in this work that the standard error of empirical flow quantiles is a function of: (1) The specified probability level associated with a particular quantile; (2) the sample size used in the estimation; and (3) the probability density function governing the realization of flow variates. An example using a series of annual runoff from 1904–1986 in the American River at Folsom Reservoir, California, shows that empirical flow quantiles are efficient, i.e., have standard errors of estimates not exceeding 10% of the actual quantile value when the return periods involved are less than 100 years and the flow record is moderately large. Results from Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the approximate expression for standard error of the empirical quantile derived in this work is accurate to within
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleVariability of Empirical Flow Quantiles
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1989)115:1(82)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record