Show simple item record

contributor authorJames R. Wallis
contributor authorEric F. Wood
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:39:20Z
date available2017-05-08T20:39:20Z
date copyrightJuly 1985
date issued1985
identifier other%28asce%290733-9429%281985%29111%3A7%281043%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/22529
description abstractThe U.S. Water Resources Council (WRC) has suggested that the log‐Pearson III distribution, fitted by the method of moments, should be used in flood frequency analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation assessment of the WRC procedures shows that the flood quantile estimates obtainable by these procedures are poorer than those obtainable by using an index flood type approach with either a generalized extreme value distribution or a Wakeby distribution fitted by probability weighted moments. It is suggested that the justification for using the WRC Bulletin 17B guidelines is in need of reevaluation.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleRelative Accuracy of Log Pearson III Procedures
typeJournal Paper
journal volume111
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Hydraulic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1985)111:7(1043)
treeJournal of Hydraulic Engineering:;1985:;Volume ( 111 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record