Show simple item record

contributor authorDaud Nasir
contributor authorBrenda McCabe
contributor authorLoesie Hartono
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:36:55Z
date available2017-05-08T20:36:55Z
date copyrightOctober 2003
date issued2003
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282003%29129%3A5%28518%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/21264
description abstractResearch was undertaken to develop a method to assist in the determination of the lower and upper activity duration values for schedule risk analysis by program evaluation and review technique analysis or Monte Carlo simulation. A belief network was the modeling environment used for this purpose, and the resulting model was named Evaluating Risk in Construction–Schedule Model. The development of the belief network model consisted of four steps. First, construction schedule risks were identified through a literature review, an expert review, and a group review by a team of experts. Second, cause effect relationships among these risks were identified through an expert survey. This led to the development of the structure of belief network model. Third, probabilities for various combinations of parents for each risk variable were obtained through an expert interview survey and incorporated into the model. Finally, sensitivity analysis was performed. The model was tested using 17 case studies with very good results.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEvaluating Risk in Construction–Schedule Model (ERIC–S): Construction Schedule Risk Model
typeJournal Paper
journal volume129
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:5(518)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2003:;Volume ( 129 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record