Show simple item record

contributor authorD. V. Griffiths
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:35:44Z
date available2017-05-08T20:35:44Z
date copyrightJune 1990
date issued1990
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281990%29116%3A6%28986%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20655
description abstractThe use of numerical methods such as finite elements to make accurate predictions of failure or collapse of geomaterials must utilize a suitable failure criterion that is able to represent the shear strength for all stress paths likely to be encountered. The best‐known failure criterion is that of Mohr‐Coulomb, but several others have been proposed. Using a dimensionless form of principal stress space, this paper reviews some of these other criteria in a unified way by presenting them in terms of the equivalent Mohr‐Coulomb friction angle implied at various locations on their periphery. Circular conical surfaces in stress space can greatly overestimate the strength of soil for certain stress paths, and sometimes contain singularities as implied by an equivalent friction angle of 90°. Noncircular conical surfaces have also been considered. These give a more acceptable range of equivalent friction angles, as they are based on actual test data. These “sophisticated” criteria can still predict equivalent friction angles that differ from each other by several degrees, however.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFailure Criteria Interpretation Based on Mohr‐Coulomb Friction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume116
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:6(986)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1990:;Volume ( 116 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record