Show simple item record

contributor authorDavid E. Daniel
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:35:28Z
date available2017-05-08T20:35:28Z
date copyrightSeptember 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281989%29115%3A9%281205%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20517
description abstractThis paper summarizes the state of the art for in situ conductivity testing of compacted clay soils. Nine methods of testing are reviewed: (1) The Boutwell permeameter; (2) constant‐head borehole permeameters, e.g., the Guelph permeameter; (3) porous probes, e.g., the BAT device; (4) open, single‐ring infiltrometers; (5) open, double‐ring infiltrometers; (6) closed, single‐ring infiltrometers, (7) sealed, double‐ring infiltrometers; (8) the air‐entry permeameter; and (9) lysimeter pans. Installation procedures are given, equations for calculating hydraulic conductivity are presented, simplifying assumptions are listed, and case histories are reviewed. Each type of permeameter has advantages. The Boutwell permeameter is especially convenient for measurement of the vertical and horizontal hydraulic conductivity. Borehole permeameters and porous probes provide data relatively quickly but permeate a relatively small volume of soil. Of the permeameters that can permeate large volume of soil, the sealed double‐ring infiltrometer and pan lysimeter are the most versatile.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleIn Situ Hydraulic Conductivity Tests for Compacted Clay
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:9(1205)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record