Show simple item record

contributor authorDean Kashiwagi
contributor authorRichard Byfield
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:34:57Z
date available2017-05-08T20:34:57Z
date copyrightAugust 2002
date issued2002
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%282002%29128%3A4%28338%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20254
description abstractThe state of Utah has experienced problems in the procurement of construction. Similar to other states using low-bid, Utah historically has not had construction projects delivered on time and within budget. Faced with critical projects to prepare for the 2002 Olympics, overworked construction project managers, and construction litigation caused by low-bidding contractors, the Division of Facilities Construction and Management tested the Performance Information Procurement System (PIPS) in the fall of 1998 on the University of Utah Housing Project Phase II for the 2002 Olympic Housing. Five other tests were conducted. This article analyzes the differences between the PIPS and the Utah low-bid procurement system, the results of the state of Utah tests, problems, and modifications to the PIPS, and recommendations to future users of the PIPS. Major contributions of this article include the PIPS, Kashiwagi’s Information Measurement Theory, and Zeleny’s Displaced Ideal Model. The objective of this article is to use an information-based business process to procure contractors who deliver on time and on budget and meet quality expectations.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleState of Utah Performance Information Procurement System Tests
typeJournal Paper
journal volume128
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:4(338)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2002:;Volume ( 128 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record