Show simple item record

contributor authorPaul W. Mayne
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:33:56Z
date available2017-05-08T20:33:56Z
date copyrightMarch 1985
date issued1985
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281985%29111%3A3%28356%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19734
description abstractFor ease and economy, most commercial laboratories perform consolidated undrained triaxial shear tests using an initial isotropic state of stress. The insitu state of stress for most clay soils, however, is anisotropic. How different are the undrained shear strengths and effective stress friction angles measured under “field conditions” (CAU) as opposed to routine laboratory conditions (CIU)? This study reviews available published data from over 40 different clays consolidated under both isotropic and anisotropic conditions before triaxial shear. Most of these clays were normally‐consolidated, although onethird were also tested at overconsolidated states. Important factors such as strain rates, soil structure, and differences in laboratories were considered to be beyond the scope of this study. For triaxial compression, it is suggested that the anisotropic undrained srength, on the average, may be estimated as 87% of the isotropic strength. Based on few data, a tentative correction factor of 0.60 is recommended for isotropic extension to account for stress anisotropy. The effective stress friction angle appears little affected by initial stress state.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleStress Anisotropy Effects on Clay Strength
typeJournal Paper
journal volume111
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:3(356)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1985:;Volume ( 111 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record