Show simple item record

contributor authorC. Douglas Craft
contributor authorRaymond G. Acciardi
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:33:36Z
date available2017-05-08T20:33:36Z
date copyrightApril 1984
date issued1984
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281984%29110%3A4%28459%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/19556
description abstractThe method of Sherard, et al., where soil saturation extract cation data are plotted on a percent sodium versus TDS (total dissolved solids in milliequivalents per liter) graph to classify clayey soils as dispersive or nondispersive, is applied to 223 soil samples from six different soil groups. The method exhibited poor overall agreement with physical test results. These data were subsequently evaluated using analysis of variance and discriminant analysis (a multivariate classification technique) which indicated that each soil group exhibits unique classification criteria based on pore‐water cation data. It appears that, for most soil groups in this study, pore‐water cation data do not provide adequate identification of dispersive and nondispersive clay soils. Reasons for the observed lack of agreement between pore‐water data and physical tests are reviewed and suggestions for further research are presented.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFailure of Pore‐Water Analyses for Dispersion
typeJournal Paper
journal volume110
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1984)110:4(459)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1984:;Volume ( 110 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record