| contributor author | S. Gupta | |
| contributor author | D. P. Jhaveri | |
| contributor author | O. Kustu | |
| contributor author | J. A. Blume | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T23:18:40Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T23:18:40Z | |
| date copyright | February, 1984 | |
| date issued | 1984 | |
| identifier issn | 0094-9930 | |
| identifier other | JPVTAS-28231#25_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/98906 | |
| description abstract | The different methods of combining responses for individual modes and directions for response spectrum analysis of nuclear piping systems are evaluated. For the purpose of the study, dynamic responses of 20 typical piping systems using nine different combination methods are systematically compared. The study established the relative conservatism in design achieved by each method and the probability that a particular combination method will produce a more conservative estimate of seismic response than obtained using one of the methods accepted by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | A Comparative Study of Combination Methods Used in Response Spectrum Analysis of Nuclear Piping Systems | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 106 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3264304 | |
| journal fristpage | 25 | |
| journal lastpage | 31 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8978 | |
| keywords | Emission spectroscopy | |
| keywords | Piping systems | |
| keywords | Probability | |
| keywords | Design AND Dynamic response | |
| tree | Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology:;1984:;volume( 106 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |
