Show simple item record

contributor authorJ. G. Wagner
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:58:42Z
date available2017-05-08T22:58:42Z
date copyrightJuly, 1975
date issued1975
identifier issn0094-4289
identifier otherJEMTA8-26841#251_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/87517
description abstractThermally activated mechanisms of dislocation motion and interaction account for the dependence of stress on strain, temperature, and time during plastic deformation. Much of the recent activity in identifying particular mechanisms has involved the use of differential type thermomechanical tests. Due to certain basic and recurrent oversights in applying thermal activation theory to such test data, the results are oftentimes misleading. These limitations are identified and explored. Minimum requirements for an accurate characterization of strain history effects are established. A limited amount of self-contained isothermal data, for aluminum and lead, have been obtained in the intermediate strain-rate range which critically test the hypotheses. The present results indicate that the results reported by others may be in substantial error. Much of the discussion presented also applies, in its most basic form, to the evaluation of constitutive models which are not microstructurally based.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleDifferential Testing and the Evaluation of Thermal Activation Parameters
typeJournal Paper
journal volume97
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.3443292
journal fristpage251
journal lastpage258
identifier eissn1528-8889
keywordsDeformation
keywordsTemperature
keywordsAluminum
keywordsStress
keywordsConstitutive equations
keywordsTesting
keywordsDislocation motion
keywordsErrors AND Mechanisms
treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;1975:;volume( 097 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record