Show simple item record

contributor authorWayne D. Cottrell
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:39:37Z
date available2017-05-08T22:39:37Z
date copyrightJanuary 1999
date issued1999
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281999%29125%3A1%2816%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/85445
description abstractA simplified version of the program evaluation and review technique (PERT) for project planning is developed and tested. The simplification is to reduce the number of estimates required for activity durations from three, as in conventional PERT, to two. This is accomplished by applying the normal distribution, rather than the beta, to an activity duration. The two required duration estimates are the “most likely” and the “pessimistic.” These modifications reduce the level of effort needed to apply PERT. Simplified PERT durations are subject to errors of greater than 10% when the skewness of the actual distribution is greater than 0.28 or less than −0.48. In analyzing 12 project networks, though, the simplified PERT produced values similar to those of conventional PERT for activity and project durations and variances and project duration probabilities. Hence, when activity duration distributions are not highly skewed, results similar to those of conventional PERT can be obtained using the simpler technique. Two suggestions for future research are to survey practitioners on the usefulness of the simplified PERT and to find a fixed, skewed distribution that can approximate activity durations having long tails.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSimplified Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
typeJournal Paper
journal volume125
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:1(16)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1999:;Volume ( 125 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record