Show simple item record

contributor authorMichael S. Puddicombe
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:37:55Z
date available2017-05-08T22:37:55Z
date copyrightSeptember 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281997%29123%3A3%28245%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/84423
description abstractThe adversarial nature of the relationship between designers and contractors is recognized as one of the most serious problems in the building industry. Research in this area has centered on integration issues related to the implementation of partnering and contracts. This paper takes a step back. It argues that the adversarial nature of the designer/contractor dyad may be attributable to differences on a set of perceived project critical dimensions. An understanding of these dimensions and how the dyad members differ is important for the successful implementation of integration methods. In addition, it is suggested that a lack of a holistic conceptualization of the contract and its relation to integration hampers the ability to achieve improved project performance. This paper reports on a large-scale survey and analysis that tests propositions related to these issues.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDesigners and Contractors: Impediments to Integration
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:3(245)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record