Show simple item record

contributor authorQiang Xiao
contributor authorSankaran Mahadevan
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:37:13Z
date available2017-05-08T22:37:13Z
date copyrightMarch 1994
date issued1994
identifier other%28asce%290733-9399%281994%29120%3A3%28670%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/84027
description abstractThe estimation of structural‐system reliability often requires the computation of the intersection probability of multiple‐failure events. Bounds on this joint probability may be less time‐consuming to compute and have adequate accuracy for some practical problems compared with approximate numerical solutions. This technical note compares the accuracy among different second‐order upper bounds on the probability of intersection of multiple‐failure events. An upper bound has been derived in the literature from the Ditlevsen lower bound on the probability of union of multiple‐failure events; the equivalence of its different expressions commonly used in literature is explained, and its accuracy is numerically investigated and compared with other possible second‐order upper bounds. The accuracy of this upper bound reduces to the joint failure probability of the two least probable events for practical problems. The different bounds are ranked in terms of computational effort and accuracy.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSecond‐Order Upper Bounds on Probability of Intersection of Failure Events
typeJournal Paper
journal volume120
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Engineering Mechanics
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1994)120:3(670)
treeJournal of Engineering Mechanics:;1994:;Volume ( 120 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record