Show simple item record

contributor authorRakesh Bahadur
contributor authorWilliam B. Samuels
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:31:32Z
date available2017-05-08T22:31:32Z
date copyrightJuly 2015
date issued2015
identifier other48437450.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/82025
description abstractOn January 9, 2014, an estimated 37,854 L (10,000 gal.) of 4-methycyclohexane methanol (MCHM) and propylene glycol phenyl ether, solvents used in coal processing, leaked from a ruptured container into the Elk River. The spill, just 1.61 km (1 mi) upstream from a water-treatment plant, forced officials to ban residents and businesses in nine West Virginia counties from using the water for anything other than flushing toilets or fighting fires. An estimated 300,000 West Virginia residents were affected by the spill. This paper reports on the modeling efforts undertaken to forecast time of travel and concentration of MCHM as the plume traveled downstream toward the Greater Cincinnati Water Works (GCWW) intake. The issues addressed include the flow regime, source term describing the spill event, use of real-time and forecast streamflow, and comparison of model results with observations at Charleston (West Virginia), Huntington (West Virginia), and the GCWW intake. The incident-command tool for drinking-water protection (
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleModeling the Fate and Transport of a Chemical Spill in the Elk River, West Virginia
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000930
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record