Show simple item record

contributor authorB. R. Garsden
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:22:20Z
date available2017-05-08T22:22:20Z
date copyrightMarch 1995
date issued1995
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281995%29121%3A1%2837%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/78952
description abstractThe Construction Industry Institute in Australia, modeled on the U.S. group of the same title, published a “Constructability Principles File” in November 1992. These principles include precepts used in conducting a postconstruction analysis by a project team drawn from the staff of Prince-Bisley Pty. Ltd., Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, and the University of Southern Queensland. There may be a danger in conducting such an evaluation if participants wrongly believe that managers will seek to apportion blame for disappointing outcomes. A protocol was therefore established and is presented in this paper; the protocol clearly sets out guidelines and states that the aim is not to seek scapegoats but to improve company performance. Case-study material is presented for a feed mill project, that was designed and fabricated in Australia for erection in China, which ran over budget and was late in shipment. Feedback from participants in the review is summarized, together with recommendations for action by management to improve the organization's performance on similar future projects. Experience has shown that postconstruction evaluation is a valuable exercise.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePostconstruction Evaluation
typeJournal Paper
journal volume121
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:1(37)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1995:;Volume ( 121 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record