Show simple item record

contributor authorChangjun Zhou
contributor authorBaoshan Huang
contributor authorEric Drumm
contributor authorXiang Shu
contributor authorQiao Dong
contributor authorSampson Udeh
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:21:30Z
date available2017-05-08T22:21:30Z
date copyrightJanuary 2015
date issued2015
identifier other43036496.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/78602
description abstractSubgrade soil, as the critical underlying support for other pavement layers and traffic loads, should be stiff enough to maintain the integrity of pavement structures and the smoothness of pavement surface. The resilient modulus, as an indicator of subgrade stiffness, is an essential input in the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). At input level 1 of MEPDG, the MEPDG generalized model is required to describe resilient modulus of subgrade soil, and the coefficients of this model are used for pavement design. The change of the resilient modulus model has raised the interest of many state highway agencies and made it necessary to convert old resilient modulus test data into new ones required for the MEPDG model. In this study, the coefficients of the generalized and the universal models for soil resilient modulus were obtained through regression of the results of 13 soils in Tennessee. The coefficients of the two models were also compared. There is a potential risk that the coefficients from the universal model may be mistakenly used in the MEPDG instead of those coefficients from the generalized model. The consequence of this improper use was demonstrated in the comparison between the miscalculated and the real resilient moduli. The coefficients of the generalized model were correlated to soil physical properties, which provided an alternate time-saving and economical method to obtain soil resilient modulus as level 2 inputs. The coefficients were obtained at different post-compaction water contents, to allow the estimation of pavement response under seasonal moisture variation of subgrade. Rutting and roughness of two typical pavement sections were analyzed to investigate the influence of the seasonal variation of soil resilient modulus on pavement performance. The results showed that moisture variation had a significant effect on subgrade resilient modulus and, subsequently, on pavement performance. It is recommended that seasonal change in soil resilient modulus be considered in the analysis on pavement performance.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSoil Resilient Modulus Regressed from Physical Properties and Influence of Seasonal Variation on Asphalt Pavement Performance
typeJournal Paper
journal volume141
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000727
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2015:;Volume ( 141 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record