Show simple item record

contributor authorA. Ian McLeod
contributor authorDonald J. Noakes
contributor authorKeith W. Hipel
contributor authorRobert M. Thompstone
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:17:15Z
date available2017-05-08T22:17:15Z
date copyrightJanuary 1987
date issued1987
identifier other40102022.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/76274
description abstractForecasts of river flows are useful in optimizing the operation of multipurpose reservoir systems. Using two case studies, the usefulness of combination techniques for improving forecasts is examined. In the first study, a transfer function‐noise model, a periodic autoregressive model, and a conceptual model are employed to forecast quarter‐monthly river flows. These models all approach the modeling and forecasting problem from three different perspectives, and each has its own particular strengths and weaknesses. The forecasts generated by the individual models are combined in an effort to exploit the strengths of each model. The results of this case study indicate that significantly better forecasts can be obtained when forecasts from different types of models are combined. In the second study, periodic autoregressive models and seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average models are used to forecast monthly river flows. Combining the individual forecasts from these two statistical time series models does not result in significantly better forecasts.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCombining Hydrologic Forecasts
typeJournal Paper
journal volume113
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1987)113:1(29)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record