Show simple item record

contributor authorAnne Glad
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:13:07Z
date available2017-05-08T22:13:07Z
date copyrightJuly 1994
date issued1994
identifier other39881265.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/73988
description abstractMany managers say their most challenging task as supervisors is confronting performance problems. They typically must balance the needs of employees with the needs of the business. They fear that they will either cave in to the employee's demands at the expense of better business judgment or, at the other extreme, that they will act too mechanically in serving the business, creating a people problem that will consume time and energy. However, there is a process a supervisor can use to approach employee performance in an open, honest, participatory manner that builds trust and leads to a mutually beneficial outcome for employee and company. The author suggests a four‐step program. First, managers must realize that turnover is costly and they must also consider an employee's present and potential value to the company. Second, they must define the problem or “performance gap” in a measurable way, without describing performance in terms of character or personality traits. Third, managers must determine if the inferior performance is a “can't do” or “won't do” problem. Finally an action plan for improvement which involves both the supervisor and the employee must be implemented.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSave that Employee Rather than Fire
typeJournal Paper
journal volume10
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1994)10:4(16)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record