Show simple item record

contributor authorHesbon Otieno
contributor authorJiaxin Yang
contributor authorWeiwen Liu
contributor authorDawei Han
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:10:54Z
date available2017-05-08T22:10:54Z
date copyrightNovember 2014
date issued2014
identifier other37399849.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/72958
description abstractAccurate estimation of point rainfall at ungauged locations from the measurements at surrounding sites is critical in obtaining a continuous surface of rainfall information. This can be accomplished through numerous interpolation methods, which have different strengths and weaknesses. The accuracy of the resulting continuous surface of rainfall information depends on the density of the point data and observational errors, which in turn affect the integrity of hydrological studies that utilize the data as input. In this study, four interpolation methods—Thiessen polygon, inverse distance weighting (IDW), thin plate, and Kriging—were evaluated at an experimental catchment in South West England at three gauge densities through the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) method. The numbers of rain gauges used for the three densities were 49, 28, and 10, which were translated to 2.75, 4.82, and
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleInfluence of Rain Gauge Density on Interpolation Method Selection
typeJournal Paper
journal volume19
journal issue11
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000964
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 011
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record