Show simple item record

contributor authorCarolyn E. Hampton
contributor authorHampton C. Gabler
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:02:25Z
date available2017-05-08T22:02:25Z
date copyrightJune 2013
date issued2013
identifier other%28asce%29te%2E1943-5436%2E0000569.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69549
description abstractCrash test procedures for modified steel strong-post w-beam guardrail are described in various U.S. Government reports. However, these tests are always performed on new guardrail installations. The performance of guardrail with posts removed because of damage or deterioration has never been quantitatively evaluated, leading to inconsistent U.S. repair guidelines. The effect of missing posts was quantitatively evaluated using crash tests and validated finite-element models of a guardrail and a 2,000 kg (4,409 lb) pickup truck. Simulations in which one, two, or three posts were removed from the guardrail were conducted with varying impact points to evaluate the effect of missing posts. The removal of a single post compromised vehicle safety because of snagging and airborne pitching and rolling. The risk of rail rupture increased as the impact load was shifted from the posts to the rails. A single missing post in a guardrail negatively affects the crash safety and should have a high repair priority.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDevelopment of a Missing Post Repair Guideline for Longitudinal Barrier Crash Safety
typeJournal Paper
journal volume139
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000524
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2013:;Volume ( 139 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record