Show simple item record

contributor authorPatrick McGowen
contributor authorLaura Stanley
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:02:08Z
date available2017-05-08T22:02:08Z
date copyrightMay 2012
date issued2012
identifier other%28asce%29te%2E1943-5436%2E0000400.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69367
description abstractVehicles approaching a two-way, stop-controlled intersection from the minor roadway will wait for a large enough gap in the traffic on the major roadway before entering the intersection. The primary method for modeling intersections for both safety and operations is to determine a critical gap size such that a vehicle waiting at the stop sign will enter the intersection if the gap on the major roadway is larger than the critical gap. The method that is currently most accepted for measuring the critical gap is a maximum likelihood estimation developed by Troutbeck. The Troutbeck method may yield biased results and cannot be used with data sets that contain only rejected gaps. This paper proposes an alternative model for estimating the critical gap that is unbiased and can be used with naturalistic data. The proposed model requires that the gap distribution of the major street be known. This proposed model is compared with the Troutbeck model through a Monte-Carlo simulation. The proposed model yields accurate estimates of the mean critical gap as long as accurate estimates of the major street traffic are used.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAlternative Methodology for Determining Gap Acceptance for Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000358
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2012:;Volume ( 138 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record