Show simple item record

contributor authorYongjian Xiao
contributor authorQiwu Ran
contributor authorJianguo Yang
contributor authorZhaoan Wang
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:01:50Z
date available2017-05-08T22:01:50Z
date copyrightFebruary 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29te%2E1943-5436%2E0000245.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69201
description abstractCrossing behaviors at intersections are conventionally described through the gap acceptance theory; however, many gap-forcing behaviors exist at Chinese urban intersections. In this study, gap-forcing behaviors were analyzed and modeled from the perspective of conflict avoidance using a new modeling methodology called virtual field graph. After providing the definition of the preemptive status and the method to calculate the preemptive level, a new driving behavior model that differentiates from the conventional gap acceptance model was established. Analysis of collected field conflict data indicates that 82.2% of drivers’ decisions are normal decisions, while 17.8% are abnormal decisions. This suggests that there should be a physiological critical preemptive level while the drivers are making decisions. The driving population’s critical preemptive level was calibrated with the collected field conflict data through the logistic regression method and maximum likelihood approach.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAnalysis and Modeling of Crossing Behavior at Urban Intersections in China
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000201
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2011:;Volume ( 137 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record