Show simple item record

contributor authorNikolaos Gkikas
contributor authorJulian R. Hill
contributor authorJohn H. Richardson
date accessioned2017-05-08T22:01:32Z
date available2017-05-08T22:01:32Z
date copyrightMay 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29te%2E1943-5436%2E0000085.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/69036
description abstractEmergency brake assist, adaptive cruise control, and alternative instantiations of intelligent vehicle control systems aspire to support the driver in controlling the vehicle and alleviate the incidents that would lead to collisions and injury. This paper resets to zero and based on data from the on-the-spot accident study challenges the capability of active safety systems to aim at the sources of longitudinal control failures. The road user interactions file from 3,024 road accidents in Thames Valley and Nottinghamshire in U.K. was analyzed. Interactions where “failure to stop” or “sudden braking” is the precipitating factor are analyzed and the main contributory factors are identified. Some of those factors are addressed by current and coming technologies—such as low road friction, excessive speed, and close following, but other common ones are significantly neglected—such as distraction, failure to judge other person’s path, failure to look, and “look, but did not see” instances.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleReset to Zero and Specify Active Safety Systems according to Real-World Needs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000042
treeJournal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems:;2010:;Volume ( 136 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record