Show simple item record

contributor authorKristen
contributor authorParrish
contributor authorMikhail
contributor authorChester
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:58:43Z
date available2017-05-08T21:58:43Z
date copyrightFebruary 2014
date issued2014
identifier other%28asce%29st%2E1943-541x%2E0000030.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/67871
description abstractThe architecture-engineering-construction (AEC) industry faces increasing demands on its projects while budgets appear to be shrinking. Building owners and operators seem to want their buildings to do more for less cost. Although this may seem counterintuitive, it aligns nicely with a sustainable-architecture approach of less is more. Moreover, in a shift from exclusively considering first costs for a project, the AEC industry seems to be moving in the direction of life-cycle cost considerations, furthering the opportunity for a more sustainable built environment. Often sustainable is synonymous with achieving certification [e.g., Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) and Infrastructure Voluntary Evaluation Sustainability Tool (INVEST) certification]. Whereas the authors acknowledge that certification can improve particular aspects of sustainability, it is necessary to take a broader approach and consider economic, environmental, and social dimensions of sustainability. In this paper, the authors explore each of these dimensions and present examples of how the AEC industry can measure, balance, and monetize them.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLife-Cycle Assessment for Construction of Sustainable Infrastructure
typeJournal Paper
journal volume19
journal issue1
journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000187
treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2014:;Volume ( 019 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record