Show simple item record

contributor authorJose Ramon San Cristobal
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:39Z
date available2017-05-08T21:54:39Z
date copyrightApril 2013
date issued2013
identifier other%28asce%29me%2E1943-5479%2E0000167.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66193
description abstractProject managers are usually faced with decision environments in which there are a number of incommensurable and often conflicting objectives such as minimizing the total project costs, meeting a certain contracted date, conflicting expenses on a fixed budget, and ensuring that certain activities achieve certain quality levels. Furthermore, in some real-world situations, it may be difficult to get precise information about activity durations or cost. In these complex and uncertain environments in which numerous factors need to be considered, the ability to make sound decisions is very important to the success of a project. Multicriteria decision-making methods are a class of operations research models that deal with the process of making decisions in the presence of multiple objectives. This paper proposes the use of the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) method under fuzzy environments in order to determine the critical path of a network, considering not only time but also cost, quality, and safety criteria.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCritical Path Definition Using Multicriteria Decision Making: PROMETHEE Method
typeJournal Paper
journal volume29
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000135
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2013:;Volume ( 029 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record