Show simple item record

contributor authorYacov Y. Haimes
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:22Z
date available2017-05-08T21:54:22Z
date copyrightOctober 2012
date issued2012
identifier other%28asce%29lm%2E1943-5630%2E0000220.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/66014
description abstractThis article posits that the complex technical, organizational, and communication process associated with preparedness for, response to, and recovery from natural and human-made disasters is harmonious and synonymous with the process of risk assessment, management, and communication. Modelers of these processes must recognize that the states of the system, whether of the affected infrastructures or of the communities, constitute essential building blocks of the constructed models. The physical states of all infrastructures and the states of well-being of all communities are functions of time; thus, the time frame in modeling, as well as in preparedness and in risk analysis, is of paramount importance. Furthermore, the vulnerability and resilience of a system (physical or natural) to a specific threat (initiating event) are manifestations of the states of the system. This implies that the risk to a targeted system from a specific threat is a function of the states, the vulnerability, the resilience of the system, the time frame, and the specific threat. The term
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSystems-Based Approach to Preparedness for, Response to, and Recovery from Natural and Human-Made Disasters
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue4
journal titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000183
treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record