| contributor author | Gregory Fehr | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:54:18Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:54:18Z | |
| date copyright | January 2012 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%29lm%2E1943-5630%2E0000192.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65990 | |
| description abstract | All failure analyses have the implicit message that the discovered root cause will somehow be mitigated. A few even suggest the direction one might take for the fix—for example, “Consider substituting Type 316 stainless for Type 304.” This paper emphasizes what might be done to avoid recurrence of the failure. Engineers in managerial positions must lead the corrective action process. Consideration is given to classes of failures for which the fixes can similarly be applied by category. There is little new in this arena of application, but in practice the misapplication of these principles is seen daily. The information presented may provide seasoned engineers some leverage when constrained by budgets and can serve as a tutorial for younger engineers on how to avoid these pitfalls as they take over managerial jobs. The applications considered include low stress–low cycle fatigue, weldments, stress concentrations, and corrosion. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | How to Avoid Future Problems Based on Previous Failure Analyses | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 12 | |
| journal issue | 1 | |
| journal title | Leadership and Management in Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000156 | |
| tree | Leadership and Management in Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 001 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |