Show simple item record

contributor authorNie-Jia Yau
contributor authorChun-Yi Hwang
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:54:00Z
date available2017-05-08T21:54:00Z
date copyrightFebruary 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29la%2E1943-4170%2E0000078.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/65808
description abstractThe combination of a natural disaster and human ignorance, such as Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, can incur enormous property damage and loss of life. In August 2004, Typhoon Aere hit Taiwan and flooded over one-third of Sanchung City, in Taipei County. The attempt by a contractor to save New Taiwan Dollar 1,000 (about United States Dollar 30) resulted in enormous loss of property and as many as 18,941 claims. This case study examines the following possibility of tort claims, criminal charges, and administrative action in Taiwan. Alternative dispute-resolution (ADR) methods and processing proposition of disasters would be other issues discussed in this paper. The catastrophe revealed how government agencies and contractors deal with victims and restore order to society. Years of research expose that an integration of various dispute-resolution methods is constructive to achieve favorable outcomes, and a stepwise approach consisting of ADR methods is effective in resolving disputes after Typhoon Aere as well.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleLegal Impact and Dispute Resolution of Disaster in Taiwan: Lessons Learned from Typhoon Aere
typeJournal Paper
journal volume3
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000042
treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2011:;Volume ( 003 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record