Show simple item record

contributor authorGustavious Williams
contributor authorPatrick Sawyer
contributor authorRichard Venedam
contributor authorVeronica E. Wannberg
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:52:08Z
date available2017-05-08T21:52:08Z
date copyrightJanuary 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29hz%2E1944-8376%2E0000079.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/64756
description abstractThis paper compares three current state-of-the-practice models, ALOHA, EPICode, and SCIPUFF for use in safety evaluations using data from a unique full-scale field experiment under low-wind speed conditions. The experiment included the release and transport of three gases: ammonia (buoyant), ethylene (neutral buoyant), and propylene (dense) in low-wind speed (diffusion) conditions, less than 2 m/s. In total there were 30 releases ranging from 6 to 30 min in duration. The diagnostics included nine meteorology stations on 100-m centers and 36 photo ionization detectors in a radial pattern. Diffusive conditions are difficult to model, and all of the models had difficulty replicating the field measurements. However, the work does show that these models, if used correctly, are conservative (overpredict concentrations) and can be used for safety and emergency planning.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparison of Three Air Transport Models for Safety Applications under Diffusive Conditions Using Full-Scale Experimental Data: EPIcode, ALOHA, and SCIPUFF
typeJournal Paper
journal volume15
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.1944-8376.0000052
treeJournal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste:;2011:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record