Show simple item record

contributor authorJames R. Karr
contributor authorChris O. Yoder
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:44:08Z
date available2017-05-08T21:44:08Z
date copyrightJune 2004
date issued2004
identifier other%28asce%290733-9372%282004%29130%3A6%28594%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/61052
description abstractMandated total maximum daily load (TMDL) analyses present an excellent opportunity to restore the nation’s degraded waters. The current norm for TMDL practice is, however, unlikely to achieve this goal without improved water quality standards plus systematic monitoring and assessment using biological criteria. Better than chemical and physical criteria alone, biological criteria link human actions, their impacts on water bodies, and societal goals, which are expressed as designated uses. To be adequate, monitoring should improve understanding of the connections among stressor, exposure, and response gradients. Water quality standards, monitoring, and assessment can improve water resources because they track water body condition, not the number of TMDLs completed. Federal and state leadership must set policy goals, as required by the Clean Water Act, and provide adequate fiscal and professional resources. States with high-quality programs should serve as models. Administrators should
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBiological Assessment and Criteria Improve Total Maximum Daily Load Decision Making
typeJournal Paper
journal volume130
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Environmental Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:6(594)
treeJournal of Environmental Engineering:;2004:;Volume ( 130 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record