Show simple item record

contributor authorAmin Zargar
contributor authorRehan Sadiq
contributor authorGholamreza Naser
contributor authorFaisal I. Khan
contributor authorNatasha N. Neumann
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:40:29Z
date available2017-05-08T21:40:29Z
date copyrightMay 2012
date issued2012
identifier other%28asce%29cp%2E1943-5487%2E0000157.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/59124
description abstractStudying uncertainties in hydrological modeling is necessary because of data scarcity or abundance and quality issues. These uncertainties can have significant effects on environmental decision making. Traditionally, probabilistic methods have been used to study uncertainties; however, recently, more comprehensive methods are used in the treatment of uncertainty. These methods are capable of addressing uncertainty in the form of vagueness, ambiguity, and conflict, which cannot be studied efficiently using probabilistic frameworks. The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence (DST) is one of the popular methods that can provide a unified platform to address data conflict and incompleteness. In this paper, the use of DST to model and propagate the uncertainty arising from two snow water equivalent data sets with a high degree of conflict (DST conflict
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleDempster-Shafer Theory for Handling Conflict in Hydrological Data: Case of Snow Water Equivalent
typeJournal Paper
journal volume26
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000149
treeJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;2012:;Volume ( 026 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record