Show simple item record

contributor authorAndreas F. Phelps
contributor authorMichael J. Horman
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:38:59Z
date available2017-05-08T21:38:59Z
date copyrightJanuary 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29co%2E1943-7862%2E0000109.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/58250
description abstractTraditional construction research methods have enabled focused but narrow advances in our understanding of industry phenomena. While contributing new insight, these methods are often not adequate to enable understanding of the complex interactions that lead to many of the industry’s pervasive social and technical problems. One means of addressing these limitations is for the construction research community to complement prevalent quantitative and case study methodologies with qualitative theory-building methodologies, specifically ethnographic studies or those based on detailed and long-term observation of project environments. This paper identifies the critical need for theory-building methods and their methodological conventions, challenges, and opportunities. Specifically, the paper focuses on data collection in ethnographic studies and analysis of that data through the use of grounded theory. Through better understanding and more widespread use of theory-building methods, the construction research community can provide a needed complement to the current prevailing methods and greatly aid the maturation of our important field.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEthnographic Theory-Building Research in Construction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000104
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;2010:;Volume ( 136 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record