Show simple item record

contributor authorMarco Di Ludovico
contributor authorClaudio D’Ambra
contributor authorAndrea Prota
contributor authorGaetano Manfredi
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:36:10Z
date available2017-05-08T21:36:10Z
date copyrightOctober 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29cc%2E1943-5614%2E0000116.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/57229
description abstractIn recent years, fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) wrapping effectiveness has been clearly confirmed especially with reference to concrete structures. Despite evident advantages of FRP based confinement on members subjected to compressive overloads due to static or seismic actions, the use of such technique in the field of masonry has not been fully explored. Thus, to assess the potential of confinement of masonry columns, the present paper shows the results of an experimental program dealing with 18 square cross sections (listed faced tuff or clay brick) masonry scaled columns subjected to uniaxial compression load. In particular, three different confinement solutions have been experimentally analyzed in order to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of uniaxial glass FRP, carbon FRP, and basalt FRP laminates wrapping. The main experimental outcomes are presented and discussed in the paper considering mechanical behavior of specimens, axial stress-axial strain relationships, and effective strains at failure on the reinforcement. Test results have showed that the investigated confining systems are able to provide significant gains both in terms of compressive strength and ductility of masonry columns. Results of the presented experimental activity along with data available in the literature have been finally used to assess the reliability of the main existing analytical models; refined equations have been then proposed to minimize the scattering between theoretical predictions and experimental available data.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleFRP Confinement of Tuff and Clay Brick Columns: Experimental Study and Assessment of Analytical Models
typeJournal Paper
journal volume14
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Composites for Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000113
treeJournal of Composites for Construction:;2010:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record