Show simple item record

contributor authorOguz C. Celik
contributor authorMichel Bruneau
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:34:55Z
date available2017-05-08T21:34:55Z
date copyrightMarch 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29be%2E1943-5592%2E0000143.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56671
description abstractSpecially designed ductile end diaphragms of steel bridge superstructures have previously proved, both theoretically and experimentally, to dissipate seismic input energy, protecting other substructure and superstructure members. Although ductile diaphragms have been introduced in the latest AASHTO guide specifications as a structural system that can be used to resist transverse earthquake effects, no guidance is provided on how to implement these ductile diaphragms in skewed bridges. To address this need and to resolve some shortcomings of the known end diaphragm systems (EDSs), two bidirectional end diaphragm configurations, namely, EDS-1 and EDS-2, with buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are proposed and numerically investigated. Bidirectional end diaphragm is a new concept, and can be implemented both in straight and skewed steel bridge superstructures to resist bidirectional earthquake effects. To assess the relative effectiveness of the proposed systems and to investigate how various parameters relate to seismic response, closed-form solutions are developed using nondimensional bridge geometric ratios. Numerical results indicate that skewness more severely affects end diaphragm behavior when
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSkewed Slab-on-Girder Steel Bridge Superstructures with Bidirectional-Ductile End Diaphragms
typeJournal Paper
journal volume16
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000141
treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record