Show simple item record

contributor authorEsra Bayoglu Flener
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:34:42Z
date available2017-05-08T21:34:42Z
date copyrightNovember 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%29be%2E1943-5592%2E0000034.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56559
description abstractSoil-steel composite structures are getting more popular in recent years. With the introduction of more sophisticated structures such as box culverts with flexural stiffeners, the review of largely experience based design models became inevitable. The paper presents the ultimate loading part of full-scale testing conducted on corrugated steel box culverts. Structures with two different spans of 14 and 8 m and different crown stiffness were investigated using different cover depths. The tests indicate that the response of the structure to the depth of the cover is not linear. The structures become more vulnerable to applied loads as the soil cover decreases. The increase in the load-bearing capacity with increasing soil covers is linear, which agrees with the theoretical models. The crown stiffening, however, is more effective under shallow soil covers. The load resistance of the structures is doubled at the crown level with the crown stiffening. The Swedish design method overestimates live load moments but underestimates live load thrusts. An adjustment to the calculation of the thrusts is proposed. The Canadian design method estimates the moments relatively well but it does not cover larger spans than 8 m.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleResponse of Long-Span Box Type Soil-Steel Composite Structures during Ultimate Loading Tests
typeJournal Paper
journal volume14
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000031
treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record