Show simple item record

contributor authorRobert A. P. Sweeney
contributor authorJohn F. Unsworth
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:34:41Z
date available2017-05-08T21:34:41Z
date copyrightJuly 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29be%2E1943-5592%2E0000003.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56547
description abstractThe purpose of this paper is to illustrate the bridge inspection philosophy of two different large railways. North American railways are primarily public investor owned businesses and must show adequate financial returns to survive. Also, without adequate financial returns it is very difficult to secure the funding necessary to adequately maintain structures and provide the service to customers that generates sufficient profit. The bridge inspection criteria are based primarily on ensuring a safe and reliable operation, an appropriate response, and the information with which to provide adequate funding for maintenance and replacement. Two different railway company philosophies are described. Of interest to the highway bridge community is how traffic volumes and structure load capacity influence inspection frequency and level of inspection. Items similar to Federal Highway Administration bridge inspection criteria are not discussed.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBridge Inspection Practice: Two Different North American Railways
typeJournal Paper
journal volume15
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Bridge Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000001
treeJournal of Bridge Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record