Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn Riker Haymaker
contributor authorJohn Marvin Chachere
contributor authorReid Robert Senescu
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:27Z
date available2017-05-08T21:33:27Z
date copyrightSeptember 2011
date issued2011
identifier other%28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000041.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56043
description abstractThis paper measures and improves the clarity of design rationale on an architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) project and observes the effects. The rationale clarity framework (RCF) defines decisions in terms of components of rationale—managers, stakeholders, designers, gatekeepers, objectives (constraints and goals), alternatives, and analyses (impacts and assessment of stakeholder value). RCF defines relations and conditions of clarity for each component—coherent, concrete, connected, consistent, credible, certain, and correct. Using RCF, the rationale clarity of decisions was observed and documented on an industry case project. A decision-assistance methodology that seeks to clarify rationale, called MACDADI, was then implemented and costs and benefits from each team member’s perspective were observed. Future work is identified that can lower costs and increase benefits of clarifying rationale.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleMeasuring and Improving Rationale Clarity in a University Office Building Design Process
typeJournal Paper
journal volume17
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000041
treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2011:;Volume ( 017 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record