Show simple item record

contributor authorKa Wah (Calvin) Chui
contributor authorYong Bai
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:25Z
date available2017-05-08T21:33:25Z
date copyrightDecember 2010
date issued2010
identifier other%28asce%29ae%2E1943-5568%2E0000020.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/56022
description abstractIn light of the fact that construction projects are expensive, complex, and time-consuming undertakings, a well-written contract that specifies each participant’s duties and obligations is required. Furthermore, a well-written contract with regard to business practice differences between the United States and China is unquestionably needed by American owners, design firms, and construction companies conducting business in China. In response to this industry need, general conditions of construction contracts commonly used in the United States (AIA-A201) and China (GF-1999-0201) have been analyzed and compared. The findings of this research reveal that the content of subclauses in AIA-A201 and GF-1999-0201 is different in several ways. These differences may have been caused by cultural, historical, geographical, political, and language variations that exist between the American and Chinese construction markets. Understanding these differences could help U.S. companies stay competitive and profitable in China.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparison of Contract General Conditions between United States and China
typeJournal Paper
journal volume16
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Architectural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000020
treeJournal of Architectural Engineering:;2010:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record