Show simple item record

contributor authorMichael W. Creed
contributor authorChristi C. Allen
contributor authorC. Janet Whitney
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:33:16Z
date available2017-05-08T21:33:16Z
date copyrightJanuary 1994
date issued1994
identifier other%28asce%299742-597x%281994%2910%3A1%2819%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55938
description abstractSupplementary benefit packages and the level of support management gives the package varies widely from firm to firm. On average, consulting and design firms spend approximately 28.75% of gross annual payroll on benefits (excluding federally‐mandated contributions, which account for an additional 10–12%). Basic cost, legislation, perceived value, and company philosophy all play a role in determining the amount that will be spent for such a package. The supplementary benefit package, however, is not a static plan. It is a program that must be monitored constantly in order to control benefit costs as well as keep track of trends, policy changes, legal issues, and the overall quality of the plan. Enhancements should continuously be sought to keep the plan moving along a progressive path. The ultimate success of the plan, however, is determined by overall employee satisfaction which is generally demonstrated by length of service. This article also lists some of the more innovative benefits offered by McKim & Creed and offers analysis on future trends in benefits packages.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titlePackaging Benefits Packages
typeJournal Paper
journal volume10
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1994)10:1(19)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1994:;Volume ( 010 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record