Show simple item record

contributor authorC. R. Pennoni
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:56Z
date available2017-05-08T21:32:56Z
date copyrightApril 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%299742-597x%281989%295%3A2%28176%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55726
description abstractA great deal has been said and written in recent years in support of planning, particularly strategic planning. So much has been said that you may feel inadequate if you do not have a strategic plan or a strategic planning committee in place. Many times it seems that poor performance is excused if a strategic plan does not exist. Why have we come to this? Have the purveyors of planning seminars done such a good job in selling that we now rely on a strategic plan to tell us what to do, how to do it, and when to do it? According to others, this is not so—successful companies have “an action orientation” as opposed to a planning orientation. There is a place for the strategic planning process, but it does not belong everywhere.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleAction Versus Planning
typeJournal Paper
journal volume5
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1989)5:2(176)
treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 005 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record