Show simple item record

contributor authorAmarjit Singh
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:32:35Z
date available2017-05-08T21:32:35Z
date copyrightJanuary 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%291532-6748%282009%299%3A1%289%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/55498
description abstractWhat should the world do about global warming and air pollution as a result of burning fossil fuels? The argument isn’t about whether global warming exists or not, but rather what really causes it. There is no doubt that burning fossil fuels and automobile emissions adversely affect the health of humans, animals, and birds. We have seen that solar cycles might be entering a significant stage, such that even if we stopped burning fossil fuels, global warming would likely continue apace. Hydrogen fuel cells will actually contribute to global warming because water vapor emissions are a greenhouse gas. The planet and humankind will, nevertheless, survive a warming onslaught. But, air pollution is a bigger disaster caused by the burning of fossil fuels that may irreversibly affect (or mutate) humans. I argue that nuclear energy is the choice of last resort that has to be activated now. Nuclear energy costs are comparable to costs for energy from coal and fossil fuels.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleThe Future of Energy
typeJournal Paper
journal volume9
journal issue1
journal titleLeadership and Management in Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2009)9:1(9)
treeLeadership and Management in Engineering:;2009:;Volume ( 009 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record