Show simple item record

contributor authorJohn H. Sorensen
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:31:15Z
date available2017-05-08T21:31:15Z
date copyrightMay 2000
date issued2000
identifier other%28asce%291527-6988%282000%291%3A2%28119%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/54617
description abstractThe United States has no comprehensive national warning strategy that covers all hazards in all places. Instead, public warning practices are decentralized across different governments and the private sector. Uneven preparedness to issue warnings exists across local communities; hence, people are unevenly protected from the surprise onset of natural disasters. Without changes in this situation, inequalities will grow larger, and the gains made in saving lives over the past decades may well be reversed. Since the first assessment of research on natural hazards was completed in 1975, there have been significant improvements in forecasts and warnings for some hazards but only marginal improvements for others. Forecasts for floods, hurricanes, and volcanic eruptions have improved most significantly, and public dissemination of warnings has improved the most for hurricanes. However, a 100% reliable warning system does not exist for any hazard.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleHazard Warning Systems: Review of 20 Years of Progress
typeJournal Paper
journal volume1
journal issue2
journal titleNatural Hazards Review
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119)
treeNatural Hazards Review:;2000:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record