Show simple item record

contributor authorZhenxing Zhang
contributor authorChuck Kroll
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:24:03Z
date available2017-05-08T21:24:03Z
date copyrightMarch 2007
date issued2007
identifier other%28asce%291084-0699%282007%2912%3A2%28190%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/50024
description abstractIn 2003, Reilly and Kroll examined the baseflow correlation method at river sites throughout the United States. The current study reexamines Reilly and Kroll’s baseflow correlation experiment by investigating the use of different performance metrics, experimental parameters, and model assumptions that were not investigated by Reilly and Kroll. The goal of this study is to provide additional guidance on how to implement the baseflow correlation method in practice. The results confirm that baseflow measurements should be obtained during low flow seasons and as far as possible from runoff events. When one has only five baseflow measurements at the low-flow partial-record site, the correlation coefficient between baseflows at gauged and low-flow partial-record sites should be at least 0.9; when the number of baseflow measurements is 10 or more, the method performs adequately if the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.6. The performance of the baseflow correlation method improves as the number of baseflow measurements increases, but levels off dramatically when one has more than 10 measurements.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleCloser Look at the Baseflow Correlation Method
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Hydrologic Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:2(190)
treeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering:;2007:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record