Show simple item record

contributor authorGautam Gupta
contributor authorJasenka Rakas
contributor authorMark Hansen
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:38Z
date available2017-05-08T21:21:38Z
date copyrightDecember 2009
date issued2009
identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%282009%2915%3A4%28383%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48407
description abstractIn this paper, we address the problem of making inferences about a population of infrastructure facilities from a subset that is a biased sample. We consider the case in which the sample is biased toward facilities in worse condition or requiring more expensive repair. Two methods are developed that incorporate a model of the process through which the sample is selected. One of the methods is based on well-known truncated distributions, whereas the other assumes that the bias operates continuously. The methods are applied to a class of facilities under the Federal Aviation Administration’s jurisdiction known as “unstaffed facilities.” These consist of structures housing radars, navigation aids, radio beacons, and other ground-based equipment, and no previous system-wide evaluation has been attempted for these facilities. We present and discuss the estimates obtained from both the methods, and examine their goodness-of-fit with the sample. Given the premise that bias exists, the continuous bias model proved more suitable. However, the continuous bias model did not surpass the truncation models in terms of goodness-of-fit.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEstimating Infrastructure Condition from a Biased Sample
typeJournal Paper
journal volume15
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:4(383)
treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2009:;Volume ( 015 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record