Show simple item record

contributor authorLora M. Carroll
contributor authorJohn V. Farr
contributor authorTimothy A. Trainor
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:31Z
date available2017-05-08T21:21:31Z
date copyrightSeptember 2008
date issued2008
identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%282008%2914%3A3%28169%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48336
description abstractThis paper presents a weighted scoring model as a systematic approach to resource allocation in postconflict reconstruction operations in two distinct environments: adversarial and nonadversarial. The model is intended to aid decision makers in prioritizing, planning, and allocating resources for postconflict reconstruction efforts. Weighted scoring is used to conduct value analysis to determine an appropriate mix of reconstruction projects in a fixed budget portfolio to either maximize overall value or to steer support toward a desired combination of core outcomes. The utility of the model lies in its ability to use the proposed methodology effectively in any postconflict environment to provide quantitative results and a structured decision making approach. While the evaluation measures or metrics may change in each environment, the core outcomes and the central tasks which support those outcomes hold regardless of the type of postconflict environment. These core outcomes of security, governance, rule of law, economics, and social wellbeing, if achieved, constitute success in postconflict reconstruction operations.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleWeighted Scoring Model for Resource Allocation in Postconflict Reconstruction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume14
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(169)
treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2008:;Volume ( 014 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record