Show simple item record

contributor authorRichard de Neufville
contributor authorStefan Scholtes
contributor authorTao Wang
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:21:26Z
date available2017-05-08T21:21:26Z
date copyrightJune 2006
date issued2006
identifier other%28asce%291076-0342%282006%2912%3A2%28107%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/48256
description abstractThis case study shows how designers of infrastructure systems can evaluate flexibility in engineering systems in fairly simple ways. Specifically, it illustrates a spreadsheet approach to valuing “real options” in a project. The model avoids complex financial procedures, which are both inappropriate for most design issues and constitute barriers to understanding and thus achieving the substantial improvement in performance that real options enable. The spreadsheet approach uses standard procedures; is based on data available in practice; and provides graphics that explain the results intuitively. It should thus be readily accessible to practicing professionals responsible for engineering design and management. A practical application to the design of a parking garage demonstrates the ease of use and presentation of results of this approach.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleReal Options by Spreadsheet: Parking Garage Case Example
typeJournal Paper
journal volume12
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Infrastructure Systems
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(107)
treeJournal of Infrastructure Systems:;2006:;Volume ( 012 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record